Criteria for assessing 2009-10 environmental watering actions

Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts

  1. The ecological significance of the asset(s)
    Issues to be considered will include:
    • the presence of threatened species and ecological communities, and listed migratory species
    • the ecological and conservation values of the assets(s) including those recognised by international agreements.
  2. The expected ecological outcomes from the proposed watering action
    Issues to be considered include:
    • how well defined and realistic the objectives are for the proposed watering action
    • the consistency of these objectives with the overall CEWH ecological objectives for the current forecast water availability scenario
    • the current health of the asset(s)
    • the improvement in health of the asset(s) expected from the watering action
    • the basin-wide significance of the ecological response from the watering action
    • any secondary environmental effects expected to result from the watering action (e.g. connected system benefits)
    • the change in the health of the asset(s) expected if environmental water is not provided.
  3. The potential risks of the proposed watering action at the site and at connected locations
    Issues to be considered include:
    • how thoroughly the potential risks have been assessed for the proposed watering
    • the adequacy of measures proposed to minimise these risks
    • the likelihood and consequence of variance from the expected ecological outcome (including negative impacts on biota and water quality)
  4. The long-term sustainability of the asset(s) including appropriate management arrangements
    Issues to be considered will include:
    • the adequacy of long-term management arrangements
    • the existence of complementary natural resource management activities supporting the long-term management arrangements, including those that improve water quality
    • the effectiveness of monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements for the watering activity including clear links to the defined objectives.
  5. The cost effectiveness and operational feasibility of undertaking the watering
    Issues to be considered will include:
    • the amount of Commonwealth water and resources needed, including relative to the contribution of the State and delivery partner to (i) the watering event and (ii) subsequent monitoring of actions and outcomes
    • the arrangements for the delivery of water to the asset(s), including the potential for transmission losses and the adequate accounting of flows
    • opportunity to supplement natural flows or other water releases
    • the operational feasibility of undertaking the watering action (e.g. channel capacity, infrastructure constraints, etc.).